nave Contact / quote

One company · Prioritisation

AI Opportunity Audit

A company-specific review of agreed workflows, systems and available business evidence, with relevant stakeholder input and a written roadmap.

Custom quote Quoted after scoping

The situation

Decide what deserves investment.

There are several possible problems or opportunities, and you need evidence and comparison before committing resources.

Consider another route when: General inspiration would be enough, one known process only needs team alignment, or you expect unrestricted access and a build.

Something useful to take forward

A prioritised roadmap

Findings, prioritised opportunities and risks, with a written roadmap and a discussion of the findings. The agreed scope determines the evidence reviewed and the level of detail.

Illustrative artefact / Opportunity Roadmap

A prioritised roadmap

  1. The concern and baseline
  2. Value, evidence and information gaps
  3. Responsibilities, controls and review

Illustrative structure — not a client result or guaranteed outcome.

How the engagement works

Three steps.
One decision.

Agree the review scope, examine the available evidence and discuss the findings. Implementation is separately agreed after the roadmap.

01

Establish the evidence

Agree the workflows, systems, available business evidence and relevant stakeholder input to review. Confirm the information boundaries before collection.

Evidence boundary agreed
02

Investigate and prioritise

Review the agreed evidence and stakeholder input. Identify findings, opportunities, risks, dependencies and information gaps, then prioritise practical options.

Opportunities compared
03

Challenge the roadmap

Receive the written findings and roadmap, then discuss priorities and the next steps. Options may include implementation, an existing tool, a process change, defer or stop.

Next action made explicit

Before we begin

Agree the question, information scope and engagement terms. Prepare a controlled context pack, questionnaire and selected non-sensitive evidence.

Value you can question.

Compare several Value Cases using consistent measures and visible confidence levels. Recommendations remain hypotheses until implemented and measured against the agreed baseline.

Time and capacity, margin and cost, revenue and conversion, risk and quality are areas to investigate. They are not promised results.

What you bring.

An accountable owner, relevant stakeholder input and available authorised evidence within the agreed scope. Collection methods are agreed privately; this website does not accept sensitive documents or unrestricted system access.

A clear boundary.

Agreed in the scope

  • Review of agreed workflows, systems, business evidence and relevant stakeholder input
  • Findings, prioritised opportunities and risks
  • A written roadmap and findings discussion; the roadmap remains portable

Outside the scope

  • Unrestricted live access to business systems
  • Implementation or automatic implementation credit
  • Formal audit assurance or guaranteed ROI

A few useful answers.

Will you connect to all our systems?

No. The starting point is a purposeful information pack and bounded evidence. Any later access requires a defined scope and controls.

Do we have to implement with NAVE?

No. Your roadmap is portable. You may choose your own provider, act manually, defer or stop.

Does Audit mean assurance or certification?

No. This offer describes a scoped company review. It does not mean financial audit, compliance certification or security assurance.

Explore whether it fits.

This is a scoped service outline. Book a fit call or contact NAVE directly.

Request an assessment Compare the options